• sanpedropeddler
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I would imagine genocide is effective at stopping terrorism, but I don’t think it is “one of the best responses”.

    • ghost_laptop@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I you believe this is genocide you are delusional and can’t even think what you believed happened in Afghanistan then, ultragenocide?

      • sanpedropeddler
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        A war happened, sure it may have been awful but I don’t think it qualifies as genocide. China is an authoritarian hellhole and it baffles me why you would think their motives are pure.

        • ghost_laptop@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          A war didn’t happen, the US Empire invaded a country, murdered its citizens, steal their resources, raped and torture civilians and a lot of other disgusting things, I don’t understand what kind person thinks that the murder of 52,893 soldiers and 46,319 civilians, if we go by with official numbers, is not by any means a genocide. They did the same they have do to Argentina, Mexico, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Chile, Cuba, Bolivia, Laos, Vietnam, Korea, Haiti, Dominican Republic, Iran, Congo, Thailand, Libya, Panama, Iraq, Yugoslavia, Pakistan, Syria, and countless others. Did I mentioned you they invaded many of these countries multiple times and committed and murdered thousands of thousands of people? No, they were not wars, if that’s your justifications, they were invasions where they secured either oil, or overthrowned or coup d’etated political figures that were against their rules world order. The US is an authoritarian fascist Empire and it baffles me why would you think their motives are pure.