I might not be understanding something about the fediverse, but isn’t this like if you couldn’t send or receive email from a friend because you use gmail Google decided to block @icloud domains?

Like, you’re not forced to follow or interact with it, and are free to block it if you can think of a reason to, I just don’t see why such an open platform used to limit users in this way

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    only until llm scrapers hit the market. they will make the api requirement negligible. like reddit is finding out now… you can block your api all you want but people are just going to scrape your public site.

    • sugar_in_your_tea
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      Sure, but that’s not the issue at all. The issue is that they’d be linking lemmy content from within Threads, as in using Lemmy content to drive engagement for Threads. Whether it’s used in an LLM is another matter entirely. Without direct API integration, Lemmy posts and comments won’t show up in Threads. That’s my take on why people want to defederate.

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        so youre saying meta may use the information youre publicly posting as if it was public information?

        e. solution seems simple. require login to view content… or dont

        • sugar_in_your_tea
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m saying it’s a completely separate concern. Whether Meta scrapes lemmy has nothing to do with whether Meta is federated with lemmy.