Cows Look Like MapsM to Guelph@lemmy.caEnglish · 3 months agoRenovictions show need for bylaw, say Brant Ave. residentswww.guelphtoday.comexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down11
arrow-up16arrow-down1external-linkRenovictions show need for bylaw, say Brant Ave. residentswww.guelphtoday.comCows Look Like MapsM to Guelph@lemmy.caEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square4fedilink
minus-squarePyr_Pressure@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoI think if a landlord wants to do renovations they should be allowed, but the tenants should have first dibs on returning at the same rental rates.
minus-squareCows Look Like MapsOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoLandlords only do renovictions so they can jack up the rates.
minus-squarePyr_Pressure@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoThat’s why I’m suggesting the law should allow tenants to come back at the same rental rate. Or maybe a maximum of 3-5% increase. Not the stupid increases of 80-150% or more some people see.
minus-squareCows Look Like MapsOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoI see what you’re saying. Essentially, that’s a ban on renovictions while still allowing renovations in such a way that prevents landlords from jacking up prices. Seems reasonable.
I think if a landlord wants to do renovations they should be allowed, but the tenants should have first dibs on returning at the same rental rates.
Landlords only do renovictions so they can jack up the rates.
That’s why I’m suggesting the law should allow tenants to come back at the same rental rate. Or maybe a maximum of 3-5% increase.
Not the stupid increases of 80-150% or more some people see.
I see what you’re saying. Essentially, that’s a ban on renovictions while still allowing renovations in such a way that prevents landlords from jacking up prices. Seems reasonable.