The entertainment giant says the terms of a free trial prevent it from being sued for wrongful death.

Disney World is arguing a man cannot sue it over the death of his wife because of terms he signed up to in a free trial of Disney+.

It says Mr Piccolo agreed to these terms of use when he signed up to a one month free trial of its streaming service, Disney+, in 2019.

  • conciselyverboseEnglish
    171·
    4 months ago

    The claim is that the victim repeatedly informed the waiter about her allergy needs and checked more than once whether her order could be prepared safely in accordance with her needs, the waiter repeatedly told her it was prepared accordingly, and it was not.

    Restaurants are absolutely capable of allergen free food prep and telling customers which foods cannot be safely prepared. Disney is absolutely at fault.

    • sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.worldEnglish
      11·
      4 months ago

      Fine, but it is just weird they didn’t have a notification in their restaurant regarding allergens and aren’t just paying him the requested settlement - like this is the strangest, most expensive path they could have taken.

      • conciselyverboseEnglish
        61·
        4 months ago

        A notice isn’t relevant. It doesn’t remove their liability.

        And he absolutely definitely shouldn’t take a settlement that requires absolving them of wrongdoing.