• Transient Punk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Look, let’s be real. Nitpicking over dictionary definitions like a grammar-Republican isn’t making anyone smarter. When you’re that obsessed with splitting hairs over precise definitions, you’re actually creating a fog of confusion. It’s like trying to explain quantum physics with a thesaurus, you end up sounding like a pretentious know-it-all instead of a clear communicator.

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        There is “I’m trying to open people’s eyes to the truth” focusing on details and definitions.

        Then there’s “I’m a cunt and you’re an idiot” splitting of hairs that add nothing to the conversation or anyone’s thoughts on the matter.

        Guess which group you fall in. (Hint; the votes on your comment)

        • Linktank@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          There’s no argument to be had, all soap is anti-bacterial. It’s a fact, not a position.

            • Linktank@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Loving all the kickback for stating an empirically correct statement. This platform is wild.

              • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’m curious enough to continue the conversation, if only because talking about definitions is interesting. So I’m not being confrontational, I actually want to have a discussion.

                You say that all soaps are antibacterial because the result in the end is that no bacteria remains on the hands. I see what you’re saying there. But anti-bacterial soap kills the bacteria, including the remaining ones that couldn’t be removed.

                That’s like saying that removing a group of humans based on ethnicity from a region, without killing them, amounts to genocide. Would you say that’s genocide too?* (And I know the comparison is extreme.)

                *I think I read somewhere that forcibly removing people from a region amounts to genocide, though. But you know what I mean…