• r00ty@kbin.life
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah, but you need to factor in the distance to the transmitter. Going to add at least a few microseconds to your time accuracy!

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sync process? The other comment was talking about the old receivers for the atomic clocks on SW/MW frequencies. It was a one way thing.

        Now in theory if a receiver also had GPS they could account for the distance. But, then they’d get far more accurate time from the GPS receiver so…

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        The watches/clocks they are talking about listened to WWV, a set of radio stations transmitting from Fort Collins, Colorado. The system long predates the Network Time Protocol you’re referring to. Radio controlled clocks/watches had no means for accounting for latency.

        • Unforeseen
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ahh OK my bad. I’ve only worked with NTP for a long time and wasn’t aware of the earlier stuff.