Author J.K. Rowling has fallen silent on her usually busy X (formerly Twitter) feed, after Olympic gold medalist boxer Imane Khelif filed a legal complaint in France for alleged cyber harassment over statements regarding her gender.

On August 9, lawyers for Khelif filed a lawsuit with a special unit of the public prosecutor’s office in Paris, stemming from false statements that spread online about her gender after the Algerian boxer defeated Italy’s Angela Carini in her first fight of the 2024 Olympic Games. Carini pulled out 46 seconds into the bout and told reporters afterwards that she had “never felt a punch like this.”

  • AngryishHumanoid@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    You seem to be misunderstanding, intentionally I would guess. They claimed they did a test to “confirm” she was not a woman, I’m saying that’s a steaming hot load of bullshit and they were just looking for an excuse and they have no results to release.

    Please cite your sources saying there are news reports that she’s a man.

    • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      That user is basing their position on a Daily Mail article citing LePoint, a french right-wing magazine, that quotes one of her trainers, who said (with context) “There was a problem with her hormones and chromosomes, but she’s a woman. That’s all that mattered to us.”

      Nowhere does that even suggest she has XY chromosomes, and, to state the obvious, he’s not a doctor. He’s responding to an unsubstantiated allegation, and probably giving it too much credit. He even says that she underwent a testosterone test that came back within female norms.

      It really is simple. The burden of proof is on people making these claims, and we’re not taking the word of a blatantly corrupt organization, that had a vested interest in disqualifying Khelif, who would not say what test was administered or what the results were. If they had more specific information, they wouldn’t shut up about it, because won’t even shut up now with less to go on.

      • AngryishHumanoid@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        First of all, and you knew I was gonna lead with this, The Daily Mail?

        Ok, let’s pretend that’s a legit news organization, now read my comment quoting Snopes and tell me if that answers any of your “questions”.

        • Snowflake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          This is the source of the daily mail article. It’s an exclusive interview with her coach since apparently you don’t care to look further into it. Again, who is intentionally doing what here?

          Anyways they should just test the chromosomes of their fighters at the very least. It’s a simple blood sample nothing too invasive at all. I don’t really care to watch an XY beat on an XX personally I don’t see how it’s an equal fight. Watch whatever you want though.

          • AngryishHumanoid@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            So you ignored the Snopes article, got it. You only seem to reply to the comments that are easy for you to deflect, how interesting.

            • Snowflake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              What snopes article. Wtf are you talking about lmao. I think you were talking to someone else not me about that. Makes sense seeing how delusional you are anyways.

              • AngryishHumanoid@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                Ok I’ll repeat myself: elsewhere in this thread I replied quoting the Snopes article on this subject. Are those instructions too confusing for you?

                • Snowflake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You never linked a snopes article to me. You never quoted anything from a snopes article to me. I don’t know who you replied to but it’s not on my thread here.

                  • AngryishHumanoid@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    The thread begins when someone says something. Then people reply. ELSEWHERE in this thread is a reply, from me, quoting Snopes. Go back to when systemglitch commented in this post, follow the path to my reply quoting Snopes.