• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    321 month ago

    South African here, we also have proportional representation, along with free and fair elections. It is not a magic bullet, we have been dominated by a single party for the last 30 years (since the end of apartheid and the dawn of democracy), so unless your population is educated and doesn’t blindly vote out of loyalty.

    But I still agree that proportional representation, even in its worst outcomes, is for me the fairest government, I really feel like my vote will count, especially in the last election in May where the ANC finally fell below 50% and had to go into a coalition government.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 month ago

        Wasn’t always the case, corruption will always be present in any government. Ours got out of hand when our “FBI”, called the Scorpions, decided not to prosecute Zuma when he was VP for corruption, if he steps down. So he stepped down and behind the scenes won the ANC party’s presidency and then gained Presidency, using a Stalingrad legal tactic to indefinitely delay legal responsibility. Then he claimed political prosecution and the use of the Scorpions as proof and disbanded them. That basically was the fall of accountability in South Africa and what followed we now call the nine lost years and entrenched corruption. Zuma was a charismatic leader that used the presidency to protect himself from legal prosecution and to further enrich himself. Even now with Commissions into corruption like the Zondo State Capture Commission finding many individuals engaged in corrupt activities with black and white evidence, we haven’t seen any real legal ramifications or really any convictions.

    • threelonmusketeers
      link
      English
      151 month ago

      Petition to change the flag to test your hypothesis:

        • threelonmusketeers
          link
          English
          51 month ago

          I like this flag more

          Also a neat design. Perhaps we should A/B-test a bunch of flags to see which ones have the most favourable effect on democracy.

  • NaibofTabr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -40
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    All of these countries have majority populations of white Europeans mostly descended from locals… which is to say that they each have a majority population that is of one ethnic and sociocultural background which they have shared for hundreds (or thousands) of years. Their internal social stability has a lot more to do with the historical momentum of their population having primarily shared interests and culture than it does with their method of voting.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      221 month ago

      Bro nationalism hasn’t been cool since before WWII, stop being the loser that keeps trying to make it happen.

    • @Kecessa
      link
      20
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’S tHe ImMiGrAnTs’ FaUlT iF wE cAn’T hAvE nIcE tHiNgS!

      Fuck off Nazi 🖕

        • @Kecessa
          link
          71 month ago

          No, that’s exactly what you’re saying. To you the reason they can have nice things is because they’re homogenous, you’re implying that diversity prevents stability and what is diversity from a national perspective? People of different origins.

          You’re saying that people of different origins create instability in the countries they immigrate to, you’re a racist that’s not courageous or honest enough to admit it.

          So again, fuck off Nazi 🖕

    • @hubobes
      link
      21 month ago

      1/4 of the swiss population are immigrants, not including naturalized immigrants. And most countries have a majority population…what exactly is the argument there?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -21 month ago

      Surprised by so many downvotes for this, its a fairly accurate observation. I dont see how this promotes or demotes anything.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s mostly because this has been a go-to response by Americans in topics about some European countries doing significantly better than the US: “It’s because they don’t have black people”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 month ago

          Tbf that’s more them telling on themselves in context.

          Roosevelt’s coalition failed to deliver the full extent of what we’d see in Nordic states and other such robust welfare systems because the dixiecrats rebelled against those things also applying to black people and not being easy enough to use discriminatingly.