• Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    If you think that I said that BEING a drag queen, or belonging to a queer community, was a ‘fad’, then I did not explicitly say that, and any implication is read into my statement by others.

    It also helps that drag queens are very popular right now, and the media is all about chasing fads.

    The popularity is the fad, not the existence. Something doesn’t only exist because it’s popular: the fact that I (temporarily) exist is proof of that.

    When media moves on from drag queens to some other topic, drag queens will not exist.
    Although media comparatively ignores drag kings, that does not mean they fail to exist.

    Fads don’t make something important. It just means that thing sells. The end of a fad doesn’t make something unimportant. It just means the market for it has reduced. To me, there is no moral weight to something being a fad or not, because I don’t really care about popularity.

     

    If me saying that media chases things that makes them money is controversial, then I guess (human-created social) reality is controversial. Which it should be, because humans have created social systems that work to oppress as many people as possible, making the world worse.