Not sure if it was just released today, but I got the email update about it just now. I’m pretty excited about this because I mostly just want VPN for web browsing, and the linux app kinda sucks.

  • MaineDPC@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s the advantage of using the VPN via the browser extension instead of the VPN app (in my case, the MacOS app)?

    • Obez@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      VPN can sometimes be unreliable. I’ve gotten disconnected from zoom meetings when using the zoom app and a system wide VPN. Also have lagged during online gaming. The extension could be useful if you are only looking to increase web browsing privacy, while keeping a better network connection for other programs.

      • Derproid
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t this what split-tunneling is for though?

        • Obez@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah, yeah I guess so. I don’t think that was available on the linux app which is the only one I used on a non-phone, so I didn’t think of that…

    • bernard@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is a question of whether you really need all your traffic going through a VPN. Your app might support split tunneling. VPN browser extensions such as Proton, Mullvad, and Brave will only route that browser’s traffic through VPN. Since I am running Linux, a DNS resolver and am generally off of most corp and government servers, my need for VPN is more limited. I activate ProtonVPN extension in Librewolf browser where I open news sites. I use other browsers without VPN for safe stuff such as my own and friendly fedi sites to get full bandwidth. I use split tunneling on Android to similarly exclude safe apps from VPN for a private and efficient setup.