• tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    so this document was just released to the press? God damn theater, posturing, all of it.

  • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Vote Blue No Matter Who so that Bad Man doesn’t get into office and launch the nukes!

    What do you mean the Democrats are the ones planning to launch the nukes?!?

    • newnton
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Tell me you didn’t read the article and don’t have any idea what you’re talking about without telling me you didn’t read the article and don’t have any idea what you’re talking about

      • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I did read the article.

        IMO any politician advocating for anything less than permanent global nuclear disarmament needs to have spitballs lobbed at them perpetually without debate.

        While the Biden administration is not putting a date on when it will happen, they are not ruling out that they are willing (and more importantly able) to nuke the planet if something offends them.

        I acknowledge that this is not some bombshell piece of news because it is “normal”, i.e. the US military plans for various invasions and scenarios that they supposedly don’t intend to act on. But this kind of anti-social behavior is not only allowed, but publicly funded as if it’s supposed to benefit everyone. I’m calling it out precisely because it is normal.

        My point is the fact that if you believe in nuclear nonproliferation, voting for either candidate won’t move the needle on the issue.

        • tabarnaski
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ok so if intelligence reports claim there’s a risk of a coordinated attack from foreign countries that have nuclear weapons, what do you think the US should do to defend itself?

          • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Ok so if intelligence reports claim there’s a risk of a coordinated attack

            The US is the only nuclear armed country with a history of actually using it. I’m a LOT more scared of the US doing the coordinated attack on someone than I am of the thought of any of the other nuclear armed countries striking first.

            Also implying I trust literally anything the US intelligence machine ever says ever.

            what do you think the US should do to defend itself?

            Boring answer: Not fucking use nuclear weapons, that’s for sure. Diplomacy should be enough.

            Honest answer: I literally don’t care about the US government’s “right” to “defend” itself literally at all. As far as the innocent people who actually live here, we will respond in the only way that our government has planned for us in any disaster scenario: get sacrificed to maintain continuity of government and capitalist power.

    • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn00e422yr2o

      “Europe does not have a developed [early warning system],” he added. “In this sense they are more or less defenceless.”

      So, to which parts of the world might Russia deploy its missiles?

      “Wherever we think it is necessary, we’re definitely going to put them. As President Putin made clear, we’ll investigate this question,” Vladimir Solovyov, one of Russian state TV’s most prominent hosts, tells me.

      • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Doesn’t change my answer, except that Putin/[insert dictator of choice here] shouldn’t be planning our destruction either, because no one should.

        Also see this comment. Tl;dr: I literally don’t care about governments’ rights to defend themselves from each other when, in any case, it will be the rest of life on Earth that pays the price.

        • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          This is a response, and the only rational one.

          Honestly though, our clandestine services would save a lot of lives by simply removing the problem from the top.