• droopy4096@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    4 months ago

    understated detail: NDP snuck up on Libs? that’s a pleasant surprise. Maybe people did notice that all of recent progressive changes were forced by NDP onto Libs… interesting

    • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      4 months ago

      looking at the graph it does leave impression that Lib losses went straight to NDP gains

        • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          minority government with NDP+Lib holding majority is OK. Cons can grab majority but will be gridlocked on every move, meaning we’ll retain status quo for a bit, until Libs and NDP will decide to call election

          • tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Cons can grab majority but will be gridlocked on every move

            Genuine question, why the assumption of gridlock if the conservatives form government with a majority?

            • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              look at the numbers. NDP +Libs outnumber them in Parliament so anything they try to pass… including budget is in NDP+Libs hands… if budget does not pass… it’s auto-trigger for election if memory serves me right.

              • tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                NDP +Libs outnumber them now, yes. I assumed by “Cons can grab majority” you meant a majority of seats following an election, no?

                • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  My understanding is that party with the most votes gets to form government, is it not so?

                  • tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    Right, the party with the most seats won would get first shot at forming government.

                    If your assumption is that the Conservatives would win the next election with a majority, then they would be able to form government without needing to rely on any other party (like the Libs rely on the NDP now).

                    Since political parties in parliamentary democracies typically vote uniformly, a majority party is generally able to pass legislation regardless of the position of opposition parties, which is why I questioned the presumption of gridlock.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Now imagine what a jump we could see should the NDP install a charismatic, no nonsense, working class leader with union credentials.

      • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s the biggest thing they could do

        Singh just isn’t a winner. He doesn’t get good media spots, he doesn’t push the message of what he can do, he is less negative than Mulcair was, but he’s not inspiring and hopeful like Layton.

        Actually the current situation is very similar to Layton’s time before the NDP exploded in popularity.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          less negative than Mulcair

          I really thought Mulcair would have been a great Fed NDP leader, though: Smart, fast, and marketable.

          • psvrh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            Ditto. Mulcair was quick on his feet and not at all a dummy. I’d have paid money to see him do an “On what date…” to various members of the Trudeau government.

            He got branded as “angry Tom” by a media that really wanted a milquetoast centrist candidate, and he made the mistake of trying to tack right to get respect from said media, only to have Trudeau flank him on the left.