• 31337
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Laissez-faire economics is a foundational component of liberalism (well, classical liberalism anyway, which I assume is what he means when using that word).

    • girsaysdoom
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yep. They got the pre-WWII concept right, except they didn’t know where to point their finger to blame so they picked liberalism. As usual, it’s the populous to blame and not the ones in positions of power.

    • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I do think liberalism carries the blame for being an opiate of the people more powerful and more closely bonded with capitalism than religion ever was. The focus on individual worth and individual freedom has made people way more amicable to being pitted against each other in a capitalist race to the bottom than even 19th/early 20th century conservatism.

      Also local capitalism is awful too. Even just one town can have landlords and serfs, merchants and beggars, guildmasters and abused interns.

        • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yes, and liberalism helps justify that by focusing so heavily on individualist worth and wellbeing. Hence “opiate of the people”.