• just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Downvoting because your sarcasm is obvious. You misconstrue free speech, with business. This is a business. They are free to not hire people who push content they find objectionable.

    If this guy was out on the street in his own free time spouting this crap and NOT on the air and not in an official capacity, then I may agree that it’s a free speech issue.

    • kevindqc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think they’re just pointing out a corporation firing someone for what they said is not an infringement of the first amendment since that only applies to the government?

    • Leeny@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      I didn’t take their comment as sarcasm, just a bit snarky…I think you’re both on the same page here

    • ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      My sarcasm is obvious but you still missed the point. This is just as valid an argument as the knuckledraggers will come up with. That is to say, not valid. This has nothing to do with free speech or any amendment. This is as hollow a take as anything the bearded, athletic sunglasses wearing mouth breathers come up with as evidenced by my parenthetical comment. I’m going to upvote your comment because this isn’t reddit and we should encourage discussion, not downvote opinions we don’t agree with or understand.

    • zarkanian
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I would argue it’s a freedom of association thing.