• @iAmTheTot
    link
    5225 days ago

    That’s like a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a penny to them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      the agencies involved here are not able to fine much more than that. But I guess a fair question is why are they only fining for this stuff after the fact? Do they not inspect periodically?

      Also the widow is suing Disney for wrongful death, so hopefully that will hit them a little harder.

      • @can
        link
        1825 days ago

        Hope they never had a Disney+ trial…

      • @iAmTheTot
        link
        425 days ago

        I don’t doubt there’s some limit to the fine, I’m more trying to point out the absurdity of how low that is for Disney. Surely we could concoct a system where the fine is based on some percentage rather than a flat rate that is probably decades out of sync with inflation.

  • @L0rdMathias
    link
    13
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    Why did they get fined? Surly the one that fell had a D+ subscription at some point ever, maybe even in the future.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      725 days ago

      Notice fined… not sued. Im certain that clause was in every single contract that worker signed…