• enkers
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You’re nitpicking. It’s not a direct quote anyways; it’s already paraphrased. They had no issue editorializing “them” to “companies”, so adding an implied “and” wouldn’t be any worse than that.

    • n3m37h
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Pot calling kettle black, I understood the title without the bloody and

      • enkers
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Maybe I misunderstood your previous comment, because I’m not sure I understand what you’re trying to say here.

        Are you saying my version of the title would have been fine without the “and” I added? I’m struggling to understand what you’re taking issue with.