• finley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s good to build nice stations, but hyperstylized stations like this will look weird and dated in 30-40 years.

    As for the cost? Don’t be so sure that a station built this way necessarily cost too much more than some dull drum station design. 99% of the cost of underground metro stations is in digging out the thing.

    • quoll@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not just this, other stations on line are really fancy, lots of sandstone, huge open spaces, extravagant artworks… it’s really impressive for a city that’s usually pretty tacky.

      Ya I think most of the budget issues are tunneling related.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      but hyperstylized stations like this will look weird and dated in 30-40 years.

      Yeah, but if they survive another few decades after that without being torn down / remodeled, they graduate to historic and become cool again.

      The key is to not let the the public get a hold of them in that interim period when everybody thinks they suck (looking at you, brutalism).


      Personally, I’m a fan of the style of the 1970s-1980s era metro stations in my city and (unlike the transit authority) don’t think they need to be renovated.

      • finley@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yeah, but if they survive another few decades after that without being torn down / remodeled, they graduate to historic and become cool again.

        Maybe, maybe not. The TWA terminal at JFK - and exemplar or mid-60s modernism - is an eyesore.

        And Brutalism, to many, was always an eyesore.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          The TWA terminal at JFK - and exemplar or mid-60s modernism - is an eyesore.

          What? Why? I’ve never been there in person, but I’m looking at pictures of it and I like it.

          (I will admit it doesn’t look very ADA-compliant, though.)

        • Cheradenine
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          The Futurist one designed by Eero Saarinen? That has certainly survived the test of time.