From what I understand, a big part of what’s happening with Boeing, is that Boeing is run by Business person who want to maximize return of stock-owner rather than by people wanting to make a good product. The gained flexibility/nicer budget from massive sub-contracting led to “loss of knowledge”, and cutting-down quality control steps which “never catch anything” led to issue being missed-out.

Do you think that MBA program will take this reality into account ? or would they keep focusing on maximizing short-term profit even if it jeopardize the company’s future ?

  • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    You know what’s most ironic, those executives decisions actually endangered their own lives. Who’s a group of people typically flying quite frequently? Upper management. And it’s more likely than not to be on a Boeing.

    Imagine being so focused on shareholder value that you risk your life for it.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Damn, that’s a good point.

      Maybe some poor maintenance needs to be done on one of their private planes. Oh, yea, that’s right, they fly private, and I bet those are properly maintained and well-checked.

    • JohnDClay
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Do upper management use BBJs? Or do they use smaller planes like embraers?