Baffled Scientists Detect Massive Unexplained Radiation From the Sun, Study Reports::“The Sun’s emission at high energies challenges present models,” scientists say, and “decisive” new probes are needed to solve the mystery.

  • cryshlee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t disagree (I actually do the exact same thing when I see the word “baffled”) but I’m interested in your distinction between researchers and scientists. Is it a common tactic for news articles to use “scientists”as a buzzword instead of “researchers”?

    • Candelestine@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not him, but now that I think about it, there is a tendency for many people to prefer the more generalized term.

      Where scientists don’t tend to use the word scientist as much, I can’t recall ever seeing the term in a journal article for instance. (I don’t read many, but I’ll read an abstract here and there) I’m not sure why. I expect it’s some categorization thing, where not all scientists perform research, so researcher is the more precise term. I’m just guessing as to the reason though, I do not have a PhD.

      • Corkyskog
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would guess because “scientist” has no qualifying definition and is also vague. I just conducted an experiment to see if a McDonald’s cups bottom would retain 4oz of Coca-Cola over the course of 5 days in a hot car (it didn’t). Yay I am a scientist.

        At least researcher or “research scientist” gives some idea of what the title is implying.

    • SirSamuel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Late reply, sorry. Basically what others have said, “scientist” is used as a buzz word. I don’t have any issue with the word itself, just how it’s used in news media