• atzanteol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    yes - this is exactly what I mean. They’ve legislated the interface but not the standard.

    • notapantsday@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s all part of the USB standard, there can be different “levels” of chargers. If I’m just travelling with my phone, I don’t want to have to bring a 240W charger. It would be way too expensive and also too big/heavy. The good thing is, if you have to bring a big charger anyway, you can also use it to charge your phone or your headphones. That’s what the standard is all about.

      • atzanteol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So then what problem has been solved? Ostensibly this was to reduce the number of chargers and cables. But that situation will still exist with this law. You may have some more convenience but… Is that worth passing a law over?

    • exu@feditown.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You couldn’t solder a barrel jack to a random 5v power adapter expect it to work either.