Forces had no direct confrontation with Hamas terrorists who killed hostages; 'The IDF and security forces are doing everything possible to bring all hostages home as quickly as possible. This news shakes us all,' says army spokesperson Hagari

Forces had no direct confrontation with Hamas terrorists who killed hostages; ‘The IDF and security forces are doing everything possible to bring all hostages home as quickly as possible. This news shakes us all,’ says army spokesperson Hagari

Israeli forces discovered the bodies of six hostages in a 65-foot-deep tunnel in Rafah, approximately a kilometer from where hostage Farhan Alkadi was recently freed. The IDF had no precise intelligence on the hostages’ location in recent months but knew there were captives in the sector, leading to a gradual and cautious operation in Rafah since the ground offensive began.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.caEnglish
    54·
    4 months ago

    I see you there making an effort to dehumanize the hostages. Shame on you.

    • GojuRyu@lemmy.worldEnglish
      11·
      4 months ago

      How were they doing that? To me it seemed like their point was a distinction between all hostages and civilian ones being released. I don’t know if they are correct, but I cannot see how it in any way dehumanizes anyone.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.caEnglish
        21·
        4 months ago

        And what’s the point of bringing up that some of them may have done compulsory service at some point in their life under a story about Hamas killing six hostages?

        There is a context to this, and there is a narrative being promoted that justifies Hamas taking hostages (which is a war crime) and justifies the killing of these unarmed hastages (which is also war crime) because they were at one time IDF (aeven if that were the case, it would also be a war crime to summary execution prisoners of war).

        It’s all about building a permission structure to make the war crimes of Hamas acceptable by attempting to classify the hostages as IDF.

        • GojuRyu@lemmy.worldEnglish
          11·
          4 months ago

          To me it sounded like they were specifically pushing against a claim that Hamas offered to free everyone. They pointed out that they only said civilians and as not all hostages would be considered civilians not all hostages would have been freed as another commenter claimed.

          I still see it as them pushing back against an “Hamas was good actually” sentiment, arguing that Hamas was not as good as implied due to a careful reading of the statement and an assessment of the hostages and whether all were civilian or would be considered civilian by Hamas.

          There is a greater context, but the thread in which this was written the context was a push back against claims portraying Hamas favorably.

          • mwguy@infosec.pubEnglish
            21·
            4 months ago

            To me it sounded like they were specifically pushing against a claim that Hamas offered to free everyone.

            You read it correctly.

    • mwguy@infosec.pubEnglish
      11·
      4 months ago

      I’m not dehumanizing the hostages. Hamas has literally clarified that when it agrees to release Civillian hostages it will not release any active or reservist hostage or military-aged males (even if they’re not in the military currently).

      During the temporary cease-fire, they were supposed to release all the elderly hostages. But they kept some of the males back who were veterans.

      The headline given wasn’t an offer by Hamas to return all the hostages as was claimed earlier in the thread. It was an offer to return some of the hostages and to keep the rest indefinitely.