• ignirtoq@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    164
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    A lot of the far right are millennials and Gen Z. While the proportions in different generations are different, this isn’t purely a generational thing. The implied message is that we can “wait them out,” but that is basically just the same as doing nothing. We can’t do nothing. We have to motivate people to vote, and then get them to volunteer and have them get others to vote.

    If that’s what the map would look like if younger generations voted like 65+, then go get those people voting so we get that map next election.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s such a great point.

      I’ve been hearing this bullshit “Wait them out” message for 30+ years. There is no waiting out bad ideas and propaganda. You have to fight it with truth and activism.

      • pdxfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        There’s also no waiting out groups who have no intention of maintaining even a semblance of a democratic Republic with participation, balanced arms of government, and blind justice.

      • ayyy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        But the exact same politicians have been in power for those 30+ years as well.

    • Moneo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      A blue map doesn’t feel very good when the results are continued genocide, republican border bills, and “the most lethal military in the world”.

      I’m not saying don’t vote blue, but lets not pretend young voters have much to be excited about.

    • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      103
      ·
      4 months ago

      Listen, one side supports holocaust and wants endless wars with no Medicare4All or minimum wage increases, and the otherside wants the same. The literal only candidate not to stick to that script is insane Trump who is problematic for all his own reasons. The real lesson is people would rather not vote than support someone shitty, and call me crazy but that I live in NYC and only see more Trump Flags and literal looks of disgust when mentioning Harris, has me pretty convinced shes gonna lose really badly, like this might be in history books next to to failure.

      • Kecessa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ok you can go back to Truth Social now, you’ve done your part

      • jumjummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        “Literal looks of disgust” probably when you’re at the local Nazi bar and say her name. NYC will overwhelmingly vote blue so you’re just being delusional. 🌻🌻🌻

        • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          42
          ·
          4 months ago

          Ok here me out, Black folks tell me she needs to sit the fuck down and slow her roll, Indians tell me they will not vote for a women, Asians say they can’t support a no bail prosecutor, Muslims call her Israeli and say she must be from Ethiopia, the ”white dudes” I see on TV all day are like her or Trump is that a joke? Again I do not see support that isn’t Trump Hate. You know, what do you like about Harris so maybe I could learn something today?

          • Batman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            You seem to know a lot of people from various backgrounds. Im sure they are all representative samples of their individual cohorts.

            Trump hate is it’s own platform, and he made it that way.

            • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              21
              ·
              4 months ago

              I am from NYC 33% of population is foreign born, another 33% is out of staters, so when you are here you bump into everyone. But I guess the issue is I also want Trump to lose, but Harris is not gonna do it and all this blue no matter who is incredibly off-putting to moderates, the fact that other posters think winning NYC is a slam dunk and people on the street hate her I think it shows how out of touch the top brass is.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                blue no matter who is incredibly off-putting to moderates

                lol what?

                The blue no matter who crowd are moderates. They just want Trump to lose so they can go back to brunch.

      • HereticalDoughnut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Hey is your again. Trying for gold in the “worst takes” Olympics? Trump flags are everywhere because these racist idiots left them up since 2016.

        • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          29
          ·
          4 months ago

          Lol they say 2024 everyone thinks hes stupid and consider Harris worse, that should be quite alarming. By the way where have we met before?

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Lol they say 2024 everyone thinks hes stupid and consider Harris worse, that should be quite alarming. By the way where have we met before?

            they consider harris worse, but give me literally ANY fucking reason why harris is worse, ONE FUCKING REASON.

            There are none.

            • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              4 months ago

              Double downed and ignored my query entirely, but you are smart because? You really can not even read but are living in America? Are a you are troll or Biden migrant because literally kys seriously, like you are no benefit to any country

              • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                4 months ago

                ah yes the classic kill yourself comment in response to a pretty genuine and direct inquiry.

                I’m still waiting, give me any reason as to why harris is worse than trump.

                • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  14
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I laid out various arguments, and had numerous discussions but thats what you heard? Like call me if you serious but this is such troll I am about to dox you,

      • Mobilityfuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        “I live in NYC and only see more Trump Flags”

        ROFL…

        I bet you see them hanging from windows of NYC walk ups and on the backs of lifted taxi cabs rolling cole

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    4 months ago

    I heard this about Gen X and Millennials. Don’t rely on this at all. Educate young people and help them get to the polls. We may not get another chance at this.

    • explodicle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think it’s still true for us. They predicted we would turn more conservative as we aged, which hasn’t really happened.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 months ago

          They are. I don’t remember the source but I probably read the same article. Millennials are the first generation that didn’t get more conservative as they aged. Might have to do with the fact that they’re also the first generation that didn’t get richer as they aged. Same is true for Gen Z tenfold.

          • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’ve seen some analysis that points directly to home ownership as a predictor of the shift in personal politics later in life. Fewer Millennials own homes than older generations; that’s mostly because of the 2008 Financial Crisis and it’s knock-on effects to generational wealth. Home ownership can create financial stability (highly regulated commodity one can borrow against in hard times) and not having that leaves one more exposed to economic downturns. Economic downturns over the last fifty to one hundred years have been consistently due, in part, to the lacking of (or the ending of) regulations as well as lack luster or non existent government intervention. The one party that’s been whole-hog on deregulation and haphazard/lackadaisical intervention for most of Millennials’ lives has been Republicans, so they (rightly) get the blame.

            There’s also been the shift from traditional media to newer sources (both for the better and worse) and younger people are more likely than older to tune into those new media outlets. It’s finances driving that shift in media consumption… for instance (anecdotally), I’m in my late thirties and I do not know anyone my age and younger who has a cable subscription. Most would say they don’t need one, that it is undesirable compared to streaming services, but the general vibe is that it’s too expensive for what you get (streaming services are seen as expensive as a whole, but the ability to pick and choose what you but into is seen as enough of a plus to either cut the cord or never have the cord in the first place). Meanwhile, I know tons of folks older than me seemingly addicted to cable news, which almost universally skews right-wing. Sure CNN is mostly centrist and MSNBC tows a liberal-center left line, but there’s CNBC, Bloomberg, News Nation, FNC, and NewsMax all of which pull center right to far right… seemingly to chase that aging cable viewer demographic.

    • kboy101222
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I think Gen Z stands a real chance. We’re the first generation where the majority of us have had the Internet from birth, or at least long enough to not remember a time without it. We’re super connected all around the globe, and with more diversity in groups comes less bigotry.

      Younger people are way less bigoted now then they were in my childhood (early Gen Z, barely not a millennial thank God). When I was in elementary and middle, everything not cool was called gay. Everyone called everything they didn’t like gay. It was completely synonymous with bad. A couple parents in my town recently got riled up cause a kid got a days suspension for using gay as a derogatory term against a gay kid. Most young people around here will tell you that he should’ve gotten more. In my day the other kid would’ve been suspended before the asshole.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Democratic voters are unreliable. They could probably get everything they wanted if once a year they took an hour or two out of their day to go vote. Instead they’ve let Republicans take over in a large number of counties and we have to deal with all these fucking jackasses in Congress blocking anything from happening. Democrats and youth voters would rather bitch and whine about Republicans than actually just vote when it matters.

    • quoll@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      democrats are useless af when they have a majority.

      get a preferential voting system so ppl can actually vote for who they want without shooting themselves in the foot.

    • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Democratic voters would be winning if it wasn’t for gerrymandering. The fact is, they are playing against a loaded deck.

      • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        America would be winning if we didn’t have the south desperately trying to drag us back to the century when they were last proud.

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      youth voters would rather bitch and whine about Republicans than actually just vote when it matters

      Back when Bernie ran and lost the nomination it was argument after argument of young voters who bitched and whined and claimed they either weren’t gonna vote or vote 3rd party out of protest.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      There are a lot more reasons for why young people don’t vote as much than just them being lazy. For example, young people move a lot more often than old people, so they have to update their voter registration. And if they don’t do that those two hours of their life they have to take off are meaningless.

      Also, I highly doubt I’d get everything I wanted even if Democrats ran the entire country from bottom to top, because what I want isn’t terribly popular even among Democrats.

      • Moneo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        4 years ago the dems ran on not caging children at the border, now Kamala is running on how she’s going to sign a republican border bill and “secure our border”.

        Is it really that hard to imagine why some voters might feel apathetic about voting for democrats?

      • paddirn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I wouldn’t say it’s even necessarily laziness, probably just general apathy with anything remotely political and using Democrat ineffectiveness as an excuse that “nothing will ever change”. Change is slow and takes committed effort, year after year, seemingly nobody has time for that.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          If I hadn’t been in a family with a deep interest in politics I’d avoid it, too. People get really mad about it, and I’ve got enough shit going on that I don’t need to watch a nationwide argument every year on top of it.

          But thanks to my parents I get to deal with all the political shit and all the normal shit.

    • Moneo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      “Democratic voters” are unreliable because Democrats do not deliver, simple as that. Public healthcare, cannabis legalization, not-funding-a-genocide. Kamala is promising none of these things. Kamala is promising that America will have the most lethal military in the world. Kamala is promising America will support Israel’s “right to defend itself”. Kamala is promising a “secure border”.

      Barring Tim Walz and a few policies, Kamala is running a campaign that the republicans of the Bush era would support wholeheartedly. Democrats consistently run campaigns on the premise that they are better than republicans, then quietly shift their policies towards the right. 4 years ago the they ran on not caging children and ruthlessly deporting families, now they’re running on “strong border” rhetoric.

      Stop blaming voters for the Democrats inability to run on and enact good policy.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      A lot are disenfranchised by voter ID laws and weird residency requirements around college campuses. Others just don’t realize the exceptional time we are in because their entire adult life has been marked by encroaching fascism and that seems normal.

      • kibiz0r@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        Or have their vote struck because of conflicting address history, more common among renters (who tend to vote more blue, “coincidentally”)

        • soul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Get up earlier or go vote immediately after your shift. Also, 30 states have laws in place for time to vote, so take advantage of that if you have to.

  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The young ones will become smarter and vote more often. But they will also get older … Hmmm

    • Kecessa
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      4 months ago

      Millennials tend to become more progressive as they age (probably has something to do with realizing how much inequality sucks and understanding the reason why it’s happening)

  • openrain502r
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I still don’t get how Boomers (and a bit of the Silent Generation) were super left wing in the 60s, but by the 80s or even the late 70s they became super right wing. Not sure if it’s just a USA thing or not, either.

    • uienia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Because they weren’t. There was a vocal minority who was super left wing in the 60s, but the huge majority were as reactionary and conservative as they are today. Hippies weren’t really representative of their generation, they are just the most iconic. Remember that Nixon not only got reelected, but reelected with a landslide.

    • Eiri@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t know how many people think this way, but I once heard a quote: “If in your youth, you don’t vote left, you don’t have a heart. If when you’re older you don’t vote right, you don’t have a head.”

      I don’t think that quote says anything good or true, but if there are a lot of people who think that way, well…

      • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        That quote has been changed a bit, but in it’s original form I think it was Churchill.

        And the general idea is that as you age your idealism is tempered by practicality, as well as having adapted to the situation and built something of a life of your own, so you’ve gradually moved from the camp of “very little to lose/give up in exchange for all these benefits” and toward the camp of, “you know what, I’m doing okay, I’ve figured out a way to make it work, and I’d rather ‘the system’ just leave me alone at this point, since I’ll be footing the bill for things that aren’t even going to benefit me that much”.

        Obviously it’s a lot more complicated than that, but that’s the gist.

        It’s also worth remembering that “liberal” and “conservative” meant something different mid century than they do now. Especially with the MAGA influence.

        • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s also worth remembering that churchhill was a racist, genocidal scumbag so I dunno how he’s going to tell me about having a heart.

    • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think the shift in political affiliation had something to do with Regan and the de-regulation of many different business sectors by the republicans in the 80’s and 90’s.

      It became ‘easier’ to make money and with lower taxes those people got to keep more of it (at the expense of other Americans). So as these boomers started getting out of college in the late 70’s and 80’s they could now become stock brokers, bankers, real estate brokers, etc instead of a 9 - 5 factory worker. And those were the industries that were getting a lot of lower regulations from republicans so why not vote for their best interest and leave the left wing ideals to someone else.

  • Mrb2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    As someone from a small European country, it still seems weird to me that you need to encourage people to please go vote. Because where I live basically everyone is required by law to show up at a voting station(but not required to vote, you don’t have to cast a valid vote just show up). While it is off course not the perfect system, I think it is still better than hoping non extremists show up to vote. It probably also helps that we don’t have a 2 but about 8 party system.

    • soul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      While there are many parts to consider, and everyone loves to make fun of Republicans for the whole “muh freedoms” thing, ironically, I want to point out that part of truly being free is the freedom to not be required to vote or even show up.

      That said, it’s stupid as fuck and everyone that can should absolutely be there casting their vote.

    • Mercuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      There’s a number of reasons for this like the electoral college and voter suppression.

      The electoral college basically means that all of a states votes go to the winner of that state. If you’re casting a minority vote in that state it’s very easy for it to not affect the outcome in any way, unlike if the winner was determined by popular vote where every vote mattered. This is also why we see presidents elected even though they receive less votes, which further undermines the system.

      Then there is rampant voter suppression, usually in Republican controlled areas. There is a strong correlation between more people voting and Democrats getting elected so Republicans try to make it as difficult as possible for people to vote, especially people who are likely to vote Democrat. So they pass voter ID laws, restrict mail-in voting, close polling places and shorten polling hours. In these areas people might have to spend hours traveling to a polling place only to stand in line for more hours before they can cast their vote.

      Add in that voting takes place on a work day when it should probably be a national holiday, the two party system, and other stuff and it’s easy for people to feel lukewarm about voting.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      There isn’t a two party system. It is only bipartisan because such a system generally reduces to two in a polarized and popularity system. even though through state or province they will often pick a 3rd party, sometimes those people will decide that their 3rd party doesn’t have a chance they just do not want to see an opposing party win so they’ll vote via popularity vote instead of their preferred 3rd or 4th party. They settle. And I’m not sure a rating system would reduce the chance of that happening either.

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Kids might just turn (comparatively) more conservative with age. I think that’s what has been happening for a while

    • Bophades@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think it’s not quite the case that people get more conservative as they age. It’s that policies and goals throughout society tend to get more progressive with time – as we learn more about our needs and those of others – while personal ideologies tend to crystallize with age. When one generation solves a problem, the next generation starts looking for new problems to tackle. The trouble is that we have to do that while dragging the previous generations, kicking and screaming, towards something more broadly beneficial to society because they think they’ve already got it all figured out. The evolution of our understanding of the world doesn’t end with our generation, no matter how much effort we put in. 🤷

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Kids have turned out to vote Democrat and the promised change did not manifest. Remaining in status quo without progress does not motivate them to vote.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think usually people are more keen to vote with age, but not sure if that’s the same with every generation

    • nik9000@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The key got cut off I think. 538 has a standard key for predictions. Darker colors are “lean” and lighter colors are “solid”. So it’s confidence. Looks like I’m this example there are no states with the medium style of confidence for Republicans.

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    If only there was one very global event currently close to the heart of genZ that might influence their willingness to vote for Kamala Harris, who has openly supported the continuation of said global event at the convention of a PAC dedicated to the continuation of said global event.

    Maybe there are other particular issues that affect genZ which the democrats have consistently ignored up until election season.

    Maybe the assumption that Democrats are owed votes is the reason they’re having such a hard time with the republicans?