Bluesky has gained a million new users in the last three days.

The platform posted about the milestone this afternoon, which it crossed after Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes ordered a ban on Elon Musk’s X yesterday as part of an ongoing feud with the platform.

Apparently, enough are headed to Bluesky to drive its iOS app to the top of the Brazilian App Store, as TechCrunch writes.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    3 months ago

    What are blueskys current userbase numbers, mastodons current userbase numbers, and are they federated with each other?

    • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      3 months ago

      are they federated with each other?

      no. there’s a sort of a third party bridge, but it requires an account on one platform to follow a bot in order to show up on another, so if someone on Bluesky doesn’t explicitly do it and you’re using Mastodon, then you’re not going to connect.

          • can
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Right, because FediDB tracks activitypub, which bluesky is not built upon.

              • can
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                Oh, right. I guess I forgot all the individual questions. My bad.

                  • subignition@fedia.io
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    How did you take away “they were asking about Mastodon” when the question mentioned bluesky first? OP was asking for a comparison of the two, which your link does not provide, putting your answer somewhere between unhelpful and irrelevant.

                    You keep arguing with people pointing this out as if your response was a complete answer… It seems like you cherry picked the middle of their question and ignored the rest. The more-generous interpretation of this scenario is that your reading comprehension sucks. That’s my point.

                    And if you’re really feeling so insulted by my pointing that out,

                    Dude, grow up.

                    edit: and it would have taken such a small additional effort to maybe clarify that you were only addressing part of the question instead of dropping a link with no explanation. You could’ve prevented a lot of confusion by being a little less lazy in your original reply.

          • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Sure, but dari does not address 2/3rds of their answer. Just posting a link makes it seem like it does. You could’ve added that it only addresses Mastodon’s user base from their answer and not Bluesky’s nor wether they can communicate.

    • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      They do not federate with each other AFAIK, Mastodon’s user base is in another user’s answer, Bluesky’s IDK except apparently one million more than before