The US has a “biblical” duty to support Israel’s annexation of the occupied West Bank, former US President Donald Trump’s ambassador to Israel argues in a new book, unveiling a plan for “one Jewish state" that he said he would share with Trump.

“President Trump has often said that he was indifferent to one state or two states - whatever the parties might agree to,” former US ambassador David Friedman writes in the book, One Jewish State: The Last, Best Hope to Resolve the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict.

“His goals always were practical and targeted toward tangible improvements in the quality of life. I believe that if Israel will support this plan, he will as well,” according to a copy of the book obtained by The Forward.

Friedman argues the US should support Israel’s annexation “based first and foremost on biblical prophecies and values”, saying that such a policy “hearkens back to basic Judeo-Christian values of kindness, human dignity, humility and prosperity”.

Friedman told The Forward he will share his annexation plan with Trump “at the appropriate time”.

    • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Soviet Russia tried that. Didn’t stop people believing in Christianity. And their anti-theist government wasn’t exactly perfect.

      Maybe human ideology is the issue.

      • ravhall@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Tell that to the Russian Orthodox Church! But I definitely agree that humans are ultimately the problem… with everything.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      China did that. They built some vocational centers in Xinijang to “re-educate” religious people. That sure solved everything.

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You don’t need to ban it. Just ignore it. Take away their voice from government, like it was supposed to be.