Decentralized governments/leaders in small communties, decentralized power sources, decentralized market, currency and so on. On top, every community gets own decentralized social network.

  • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    You are making good points, but I’d say there is a point in “size” which no longer a centralised entity makes sense, and it must be divided in order to provide better, independent service.

    Everything has a critical size. It would be terrible if there was a “hospital” city for an entire country instead of a hospital per X amount of citizens.

    Or it would be terrible to power the entire world from a single power plant, for many absurd reasons.

    • TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yea ofc there is allways a too big. But energy makes a lot more sense over a big area. Not in form of a big power plant, but in a big energy network. If it’s sunny in one region and they make a lot more power than they can use and at the same time a different region has a power shortage, because it’s a cloudy day it only makes sense to share the energy. The larger the skale of your network the more efficient is your energy production. Less recources get wasted.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Absolutely, a single hospital for an entire country would not work. But also, small clinics on every street corner would not work because none of them would be able to support more complex/expensive functions like surgical wards, FMRI or biochem labs. The hospital needs to be scaled so that it can support those things, but then it only makes sense for it to serve a larger community because it’s going to need a large staff and a substantial budget - so it needs to be at least locally centralized.

      As you said, there’s a critical size.