• Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The part where the content creator doesn’t get paid and is supposed to according to the rules of the platform is the part where it’s piracy.

    • sugar_in_your_tea
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s really not. Piracy is copyright violation, and an ad blocker doesn’t violate copyright, it just violates the platform’s TOS.

        • sugar_in_your_tea
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          How so? This is straight from the dictionary:

          3
          a: the unauthorized use of another’s production, invention, or conception especially in infringement of a copyright
          b: the illicit accessing of broadcast signals

          • unauthorized - I’m not hacking around any YouTube authentication, nor did I agree to any additional terms of service
          • infringement of copyright - again, I’m not sharing it, reposting it, etc; I’m just accessing it as normal
          • illicit - I’m not breaking any laws

          So which part is incorrect?

          • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            You continue defining yet more terms to avoid saying another. You do you, but that’s not how the world works

            • sugar_in_your_tea
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              What am I avoiding? You said my definition of piracy was incorrect. So I provided a commonly used dictionary definition of piracy to show my point.

              If you have another definition that is widely used, I’m happy to discuss it. But something isn’t piracy just because someone isn’t getting paid when they expect to be paid, it’s only piracy if you actually meet the definition of piracy.

                • sugar_in_your_tea
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Where’s the lie? I provided the definition, and explained how what I said relates to it. If you disagree, point it out.

                  • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    The part where your text wasn’t from a cited agreed upon source, but your own ass. God damn give it a rest and take your ADHD meds ffs.