Everything I know about Larian tells me that they did not try very hard to hide it. They had to for liability and contractual obligations, I am sure, but they didn’t try very hard to hide it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3610 days ago

    Oh yeah, I have no doubt that Larian saw no need to block that feature but had their hand forced, they always were extremely modding friendly and welcoming of player made content

    • @ZombiFrancis
      link
      2410 days ago

      BG3 has a strong enough following I could see the entirety of NWN and all its expansions being remade by fans.

  • Wanderer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    910 days ago

    Karlach good ending that gets added officially?

  • UlyssesT [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    A potential campaign without yet more tiresome “original IP do not steal” underdark/illithid rehashes!

    That shit was old and boring to me since the 90s!

  • @VirtualOdour
    link
    110 days ago

    ‘This company I like must secretly want us to hack their code because I am a good person and they are good people so we must think exactly the same!’

    OK buddy, tell yourself what you need to.

    • Jo MiranOP
      link
      fedilink
      1810 days ago

      Larian has always supported modding and D:OS 2 included a GM Tool, but BG3 belongs to WotC/Hasbro which likely limits what Larian can allow players to do, officially. My assessment comes from many years of watching how Swen and Larian treats players and how WotC/Hasbro treats players. But, if you enjoy snarky cynicism, I am not going to piss on your birthday cake.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        19 days ago

        IF you’re correct, then hasbro would just force them to fix it, and it’d become a never ending game of whack a mole, where probably every update has to break existing mods based on the hack to further disuade people.