• Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    If I could pick anyone, it would be Claudia De La Crúz, but even if I vote for her she won’t win. I just want Liberals to stop pretending that voting for Harris will cease the genocide, because it won’t, and it’s monstrous to suggest otherwise.

    • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yep, you’re right that she wouldn’t win and you would be propping up Trump by voting for her. I don’t see any “liberals” saying she’ll stop the genocide, either. I only see you bringing up that point in this thread.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Read the thread, there are plenty of people on this thread pretending Harris will be better for Palestine, which is a lie.

        • Lightor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          There are two people, by definition one is better. So you saying her being better is a lie must mean you think Trump is better. Which is insane.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            This is a new level of liberal gymnastics, lmao.

            Materially, if Trump and Kamala approve the same genocidal weapon shipments, regardless of their individual feelings, what changes? Do you think Trump has fascist magic that makes the bombs Kamala promised to send anyways more deadly?

            • Lightor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              No, but if you look beyond a single isolated thing you’re crusading for your realize that sending weapons over seas isn’t the only power the president has. The president can make the world much worse beyond a single conflict in the middle east.

              You can’t see being that single issue. Other people are looking at long reaching impact. If my your admission they both want to send bombs, then look at what else they are doing. Try to effect some level of change and take action instead of just judging and bitching.

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                A bit nasty to describe genocide as “a single conflict in the middle east,” but regardless, the GOP and DNC are aligned on foreign policy.

                • Lightor@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Nasty? Is it multiple conflicts, is it not in the middle east? Or are you just mad and want to use inflammatory words to drive a discussion off feelings not reality.

                  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    The reality is that it’s genocide, using passive language is a rhetorical strategy to downplay the internationally recognized genocide.

        • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s not what you said. You originally said “cease the genocide”, which neither candidate will do and no one here is saying otherwise.

            • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              3 months ago

              He will make it worse, because he is a fascist. It’s not magic, basic knowledge of how congress and fascism work. Just because you don’t understand something doesn’t make it “magic”.

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                So if a fascist takes office, bipartisan agreemants based on preset budgets magically shift, and cause the shipments to increase in magnitude? Sounds like magic to me.

                • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Those budgets get changed constantly, and if you think Trump and the GOP won’t change them you’re a bigger idiot than I initially realized.

                  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    The GOP is aligned with the DNC in this matter, the DNC is not blocking anything nor is the GOP pushing for more. Both are in agreement. If the GOP gets more congress seats, the anti-genocide section of the DNC still can’t change anything.