• snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    2 months ago

    Too bad they let him continue to lie about the thing they just fact checked, let him talk beyond his allotted time, reapond when it wasn’t his turn, and shut down Harris the one time she tried to respond out of turn.

    The moderators crossed an extremely low bar on fact checking last night, but did everything else the same way they always have.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      2 months ago

      All his talking didn’t help him at all. I don’t think the Harris side cared about him self-destroying his image and giving lots for the talk shows later to make fun of.

      • Bakkoda
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        It gives him a platform. End of story. Every single minute he talks it allows for normalization.

        • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          2 months ago

          This works for some things, but it’s like the parable of the boiled toad: you need to push on the edges of truth, not come out guns blazing with “post-birth abortions”, “Immigrants eating family pets”, and “Democrats wanted Roe v Wade overturned also”

    • ricecake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s complicated, since the Harris campaign wanted him to have more opportunities to ramble, interrupt and get mad. They were very much counting on him being himself and comparing that to someone who can speak in coherent sentences without getting mad.

      • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        My thoughts as well. Trump did himself no favours with undecideds and independents with his inane rambling rants. For the most part, Harris just seemed content to use her time to press him and let him make a fool out of himself, with only a couple of instances popping up when she seemed to want to interject but couldn’t.

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 months ago

      He shut her down twice. The one time was really over the line. But I loved the moderator saying there is no place in the USA that executing babies is legal. Wtf, 9 month abortions? Lol

      • kofe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        My mom fully believes this shit for some reason. She believes mothers carry to 9 months and just abort out of inconvenience, and that doctors don’t work to keep the fetus alive out of the womb if possible. She shares pictures with descriptions of the procedures with zero sources beyond Christian crisis pregnancy centers. Or just Christians.

        And she wonders why I started exhibiting signs of PTSD before I was even six.

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      I support it. They have a job to let viewers know that the radical information is not true, and they should not take it as valid information to get worked up over.

      It’s the difference between Trump sounding like a maniac vs exposing a controversy. They don’t need to stop him from sounding like a maniac. They just need to clarify that he is, in fact, a maniac.