sh.itjust.works
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Science@lemmy.mlEnglish · 8 months ago

Analysis: Nuclear war would be more devastating for Earth’s climate than cold war predictions

www.ucl.ac.uk

external-link
message-square
51
link
fedilink
24
external-link

Analysis: Nuclear war would be more devastating for Earth’s climate than cold war predictions

www.ucl.ac.uk

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Science@lemmy.mlEnglish · 8 months ago
message-square
51
link
fedilink
Professor Mark Maslin (UCL Geography) highlights in The Conversation research that used modern climate models to map the effects of a nuclear war, and which found the resulting nuclear winter would plunge the planet into a “nuclear little ice age” lasting thousands of years.
  • inlandempire@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Putin: NATO’s Approval of Use of Long-Range Missiles by Ukraine Will Mean It is at War With Russia

    ‘Extremely Clear’: Kremlin Comments on Putin’s Warning About West’s Arms Striking Deep Into Russia

    Putin Warns NATO Long-Range Missile Strikes Will Put Them at War with Russia

    Russia warns NATO of ‘direct war’ over Ukraine

    Enemies must realize Russia could go nuclear – ex-Kremlin adviser

    Do note that I did not have to look for “western anti russian propaganda media” like… mainstream news. These are Russian state sponsored news websites.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes, all of those say that use of long range missiles within Russia would be the red line. And the reason it would be a red line is because this would be NATO personnel doing strikes directly into Russia.

      • inlandempire@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Idk where you’re going with this, I just felt like looking for direct quotes, because you asked for any quote from Russian officials saying that X would mean war with NATO.

        While stating :

        I’ll save you the trouble though, cause it doesn’t exist.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I was very clearly replying to this statement claiming that Russia has supposedly outlines lots of previous red lines that have been broken.

          Russia claiming X means war with NATO has been a bit of a recurring theme throughout the war.

          Are you just intentionally ignoring the context here?

          • inlandempire@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            No I believe you’re being intellectually disingenuous, because you’re now paraphrasing the comment you responded to, to try and twist the argument in your favour, the previous interaction was :

            • Russia claiming X means war with NATO has been a bit of a recurring theme throughout the war.

            To which you directly replied

            • Please do provide a previous official quote from Russia stating that. I’ll save you the trouble though, cause it doesn’t exist.

            I’m not sure I quite like where this is going and I’m not in the mood for arguing over such a minimal thing, so I’d like to end the interaction here, see ya around !

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              I’m not twisting anything here. I’ve been very clear regarding the specific point I was making. The context of this whole thread is that the use of long range weapons do do deep strikes is the one clear red line that Russia articulated. The fact that you’re trying to twist this into something else shows that you’re the one being intellectually dishonest here. Bye.

Science@lemmy.ml

science@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 14 users / day
  • 104 users / week
  • 285 users / month
  • 1.65K users / 6 months
  • 586 local subscribers
  • 15.1K subscribers
  • 1.05K Posts
  • 3.39K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org