• breetai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      Or how about we just don’t execute people? I find the practice a little pointless and barbaric.

        • C126
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          And some don’t deserve to die. Can you give it to them? Then don’t be so quick to deal out death and judgement.

        • Ookami38
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, no. That’s not how morality works. People have an inherent right to life regardless of how you feel. Ending that life is a violation of that right, as long as that life is of a human. So the options are either don’t kill people, or dehumanize people, and neither of those a good society makes.

          • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            No, I disagree. People like Hitler, which is who I was thinking about when I made my original comment, don’t deserve to live and you won’t change my mind on that.

            • Ookami38
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              As long as he was in power and able to cause havoc, then he’s that’s self defense. As soon as (if history had taken a different turn) he was imprisoned and no longer a threat to anyone, his life is as valued as anyone else’s. That doesn’t mean he doesn’t have to face consequences, just ones that aren’t murder.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You can never in a million years be 100% certain.

      Not even if you see it with your own eyes.

      It is the argument why civilized countries removed the death penalty entirely.