• Nelots@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    But you did jump to a bullshit conclusion without evidence. First. Only, it was about OP instead of this guy.

      • Nelots@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Very bold of you to complain about people jumping to bullshit conclusions, when you seem to immediately do that with anybody that disagrees with you. Also, watching and stalking somebody online for almost a year is not the flex you think it is. Block him, report him, move on.

      • tjsauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        What are you doing watching someone for a year? What could you possibly gain from that effort? OP clearly lives in your head rent free

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Yawn. I appreciate the notice though, so I know who to tag and ignore in the future

          • Resonosity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Seems to me that noticing content on Lemmy that you don’t want to see, then not banning said content which you have the full right to do as a Lemmy user is the ultimate cuck lmao. This is not the own you think it is

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Seems to me that if you believed this you would’ve blocked me and not replied.

              Also, the word is “blocked”, not banned

      • Kecessa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        You know you’re allowed to block users instead of obsessing and stalking them…

          • explodicle
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Your client can ban specific users for you only, and you can block individual communities if you don’t like their moderation.

            But I’m guessing they embarrassed you a year ago and you actually want them banned from the internet.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes qanon, well known for making observations and occasionally sharing them. What the fuck are you people on? It is incredibly bizarre that when you people disagree with someone, suddenly they’re a psychopath. If you care to learn about linkerbaan, spend 3 minutes looking at his profile. Or just be pissed that someone else did, I don’t care.