An erra is to come to an end as the Eu says enough is enough and introduces new rules and hefty fines.

  • mumblerfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    What does it mean to “open up” an operating system in this context? Do they mean something like the possibility to intall other OSes on their devices, or that the app stores needs to be more open? I’m guessing it does not mean they have to start open source:ing parts of the OS… or?

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Probably to allow proper sideloading of apps, instead of the contrived bullshit they already tried to pull.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I would love if device makers were forced to open up their hardware to other OSs. Unlockable bootloaders for all as well as allowing users to install their own signing keys so secure boot can remain enabled.

      Granted, there would still be black box firmware required to use half the components inside, but that’s another battle.

      • kayazere@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        This should be a right of the consumer that purchased the hardware. Same goes for gaming consoles. You used to be able to officially install Linux on a PlayStation.

        • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          “But we’re selling the hardware at a loss, so letting you own what you paid for would break our crappy business model” /s

        • bizarroland@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’d be okay with it even if it were on a time delay.

          Like if device manufacturers had to publish their software in order to no longer officially support the device that would be a welcome compromise and at least a step in the right direction right?

          • kayazere@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes I think we this in addition to be able to unlock the boot loader. This allows the community to continue to provide security updates after the company abandoned the product through planned obsolescence.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah agreed to an extent but I would say a massive portion of those who installed linux attempted to pirate games. It makes sense to block it.

          I’d prefer to mandate that they allow other stores on the consoles or mandate no advertisements or promotions on the console.

          • azuth
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s a lie.

            The original Sony feature did not give access to all the hardware and thus it was not possible to play ps3 games on it.

            Their ban actually motivated people to crack Sony’s measures and install Linux with full access to the hardware.

            • Squizzy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Well it wasnt a lie it was an estimation of the use, I ws in that scene then and it was intrinsically linked to homebrew. I am a proponent of piracy and feel that media should be collected and stored to ensure we dont lost content in the years to come. But I emulate and pirate loads of games and consoles.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      From the last paragraph, it sounds like the intent is to make it easier to switch devices and services, which would be great

    • Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      We are talking about lawmakers making this demand. They don’t have a fucking clue what the difference is between all these possibilities.

  • LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Rather than waiting around for the legal system to nanny me, I’ve gone ahead and committed to only purchase hardware that does not attempt to restrict me.

    • Rob200@lemmy.autism.placeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Such as Android, (which some these restrictions seem to be coming to Android to to an extent.)

      • mal3oon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The thing with AOSP though, that it has the potential to stand on its own, given a talented dev team behind it. I see this everywhere in the ROM communities. So actually Android is a great example, despite what a lot of people say about Google “monopoly”.

  • Tuxman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hey EU! Microsoft is not letting me play Mario Odyssey on their closed system!! Fix it!

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Damn… this is the first time I don’t agree with the outcome of an EU decision regarding Apple.

        • claudiop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          The I in IP stands for intelectual; AKA, the clever things they reached with their thoughts. The artificial limitations are not IP, simply mechanisms they included exclusivity. They needn’t be clever. if (!apple) { rejectApp(); hideDocs() } is not IP.

  • h4lf8yte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Let’s make them open up their hardware instead with all the software or documentation needed to run it and have them compete with aftermarket operating systems.

  • Rob200@lemmy.autism.placeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hey comment section I forgot to add the URL to this post before posting it earlier today, I added it in now.

  • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Apple opening up would makes to mean toward them more. Still, I’m only going to get a new phone after 2026, after the EU’s battery mandate in force.