Republican majority eager for hand-counts of voting tallies, which experts say are time-consuming and unreliable

The Georgia state election board is set to meet on Friday and consider another round of last-minute election changes that could cause delays and confusion after election day in a critical battleground state.

The Republican majority on the board is expected to approve a rule that would require three people in every precinct to check machine-vote tallies by hand-counting the election results. Voting experts have long warned that hand-counts are time consuming, costly, and less reliable than machines. It’s a process that nonetheless has been favored by conservative activists who doubt the results of the 2020 election.

The board will also consider proposed rules that would mandate daily hand-counts of early votes, require public reports of voters who have cast a ballot during early voting, allow for greater poll-watcher access during tabulation, distinguish emergency and mail-in ballots, and require that ballots be tracked through the mail.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

  • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    2 months ago

    So Georgia Republicans have clearly decided they have no chance to actually win this election. So they’ve decided they’re gonna lie and cheat.

    I know this sounds horrible, but for the Republicans to be this panicked doesn’t exactly bode well for their chances, even if they cheat.

    Everyone needs to turn out to vote. No excuses. No sitting this one out. If you aren’t voting but have the ability to, then you need to reconsider sitting this one out.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I know this sounds horrible, but for the Republicans to be this panicked doesn’t exactly bode well for their chances, even if they cheat.

      I was there for the election of George W Bush. My takeaway is that you can absolutely win by cheating, if the opposition just lets you do it.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    It is a sad state of affairs that as an American, I have to click the article to see “Which Georgia”

      • skizzles@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        They definitely aren’t. They just passed an anti-lgbt bill and the next day a well known trans woman was stabbed to death.

  • Kecessa
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Meanwhile in Canada we just do it manually and have the results in the evening, just have enough stations and pay people something that makes sense and the count won’t take more than an hour per station…

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    2 months ago

    hand-counts of voting tallies, which experts say are time-consuming and unreliable

    That’s cute.

    Hey. We’re gonna have an election. Campaigning will last 90 days, voting one day. We’ll have a bunch of polling stations so wait-time will be around 5 minutes. We’re gonna use paper ballots, ink pens and cardboard screens so we can quickly pop up a polling station with minimal prep. It’ll be over in 24 hours and it will be certified by all parties.

    But no, you keep using expensive hackable machines to do your vote.

    • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      The machines are more easily verifiable than the paper ballots. They just can’t find anyone smart enough to verify for the republican side, not that they trust the opinions of experts even on their own payroll.

      It’s like, to all the people on their side, the machines are some scary, unknowable box that nobody understands what goes on inside them… some sort of devil magic or something. How can anyone know how to make sure the machine hasn’t been tampered with?

      In actuality, they specifically want paper ballots because the ways to tamper with them are more well known and accessible to them. The machines wouldn’t allow for it.

    • teamevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’re either stupid or lying or possibly both. If they were so hackable the Nazis wouldn’t need to hand count…