• Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    In November 2023, the publisher of smash-hit videogame Genshin Impact obtained a DMCA subpoena hoping to identify who was behind the leak of unreleased artwork on Elon Musk’s X platform. X Corp. challenged the subpoena, citing the user’s anonymous speech rights under the First Amendment. In an order published this week, a district court judge denied X Corps’ motion to quash, in theory exposing the alleged leaker’s identity to Cognosphere.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      citing the user’s anonymous speech rights under the First Amendment.

      Is there any validity to this theory?

      I never heard anonymity being protected by 1st AM

      • interurbain1er
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 months ago

        Accordingly, an author’s decision to remain anonymous, like other decisions concerning omissions or additions to the content of a publication, is an aspect of the freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment.

        US Supreme Court, McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission (1995)

        More:

        https://epic.org/issues/democracy-free-speech/anonymity/

      • lath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        A quick skim says anonymity is protected under it, with exceptions. Mostly for criminal acts. Particularly here, if the leaked artwork falls under “intellectual property” then the exception applies and anonymity isn’t protected.