• ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    LASIK procedures are “permanent”, at best, till the patient’s mid-40s. one source.

    Pay once or pay multiple times a year?

    no glasses wearers pay “multiple times a year” for new spectacles and lenses. the frequency does go up to once in two years or once a year after the mid-40s because of presbyopia, but that expense would be incurred anyway whether one gets a LASIK procedure done or not.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      From your own link?

      LASIK eye surgery may mean no more corrective lenses. But it’s not right for everybody. Learn whether you’re a good candidate and what to consider as you weigh your decision.

      And maybe read the information on the over 40, it says laser is a solution to that, it says nothing about it still happening with laser, I think you are conflating issues.

      • ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        do take the time to read the full article. particularly the section titled “LASIK vs. Reading Glasses”.

        separately, my cohorts and I are in the mid-40s and have undergone LASIK evaluation. the unanimous consensus given each of us is that we will have to undergo the procedure again and again as our eyes age. that we will have to fall back on glasses.

        i speak from personal experience on this topic.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yes there is people for who it can’t permanently fix their vision, that doesn’t mean it’s not possible for others dude.

          • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Presbyopia is the age-related hardening of the lens and weakening of the muscles used for focusing. The process is progressive and irreversible. Lasik is not a good option for people with presbyopia and any surgeon recommending it is not acting in your best interest as a patient. You should probably seek a second opinion!

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Lasik generally comes with a 20 year warranty. Glasses and contacts come with none. Do you work for a pharmaceutical company? You certainly seem to be shilling temporary treatments rather than even semi permanent cures.

      I’m also in my 40s and would rather pay for a solution that will last till my 60s rather than get glasses every year for 20 years. Lasik is just cheaper in the long run, and the fact that you call it elective would be hilarious, if you weren’t being so conservative.

      Embrace modern medicine.

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The 20 year warranty on Lasik doesn’t guarantee a lifetime of normal vision. The surgery can neither correct nor prevent presbyopia, the most common form of age-related far-sightedness. This reduction in vision is caused by a hardening and loss of flexibility in the lens as well as a weakening of the muscles used for focusing.