• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This mental gymnastics definition of a paywall is not widely accepted. I was pointing out a small mistake. Is my website paywalled because you need to spend electricity to access it? A paywall is one where a monetary transaction is involved to view the content; that’s just what the word means.

    • xor@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      wow, i didn’t know words became immutable as soon as they’re added to wikipedia….
      or that monetary compensation is the only way to pay someone….

      fantabulous

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just because you dislike two things, you don’t have to lump them under the same definition. Language could evolve to consider registration-required sites to have a paywall, but that would be stupid and counter to similar usages of “pay”. People seem really eager to stretch negative definitions to include other things they dislike, but it’s not the word that makes something bad, it’s the thing itself. Two things can be different/distinct concepts and also be equally bad.

        • xor@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          just because you can’t understand things doesn’t mean you have to pretend i’m lumping things because i dislike them….

          “pay” has NEVER been limited to currency… you’re just myopically capitalist….

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            And you jump to ad hominem as soon as you’re challenged. You should improve your conversation skills or you will flounder around and never correct inaccuracies in your beliefs. If you believe you do not have inaccuracies in your beliefs despite never changing them, you are wrong. Good luck.

            • xor@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              lol… no, you jumped to ad hominem… a word that you apparently don’t understand

              • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                “No, you” is the best response you can come up with? Come on man.

                This isn’t worth my time. Blocked. I’ll leave you with an acronym as a parting gift you’ll find useful:

                PW;DR - Paywall; Didn’t Read

                • xor@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  you’re an idiot and i’m not taking this “conversation” seriously….
                  and “no you” because you’re literally doing the thing you’re accusing me of, not because i’m rubber and you’re glue