• festnt
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    thats why the d4 has +strength modifier though

    • Rolando@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      But imagine a barbarian bit a DM, and then some guy who hit the gym a lot and could lift as much as the barbarian bit an identical DM. I maintain that the barbarian would do more damage, due to a lifetime of e.g. breaking bones with their mouth, gnawing the bark off a tree, etc.

      • festnt
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        but why would a barbarian do all those things? the barbarian class is just a strong and tough guy who gets angry, not an actual barbarian that eats bark and stuff like that

        i mean they can be but they can also be simple people who are strong and get angry easily (without doing what people would call barbarities)

        • Rolando@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          hmmm you may have a point. I guess I was thinking of barbarian in terms of:

          People of towns and cities take pride in their settled ways, as if denying one’s connection to nature were a mark of superiority. To a barbarian, though, a settled life is no virtue, but a sign of weakness. The strong embrace nature—valuing keen instincts, primal physicality, and ferocious rage. Barbarians are uncomfortable when hedged in by walls and crowds. They thrive in the wilds of their homelands: the tundra, jungle, or grasslands where their tribes live and hunt.

          https://www.dndbeyond.com/classes/9-barbarian

          In the context of embracing nature and thriving in the wilds, it seems like a barbarian would have more cause to use their teeth.