• cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I just say S-C-S-I instead of “Scuzzy” or whatever it is

      Everyone says H-T-T-P, why don’t they say “Hettep”‽

      • sugar_in_your_tea
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nah, it’s scuzzy.

        And when I’m trolling, I say “huh-tu-tu-puh” for HTTP.

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          To get Scuzzy you have to fundamentally modify SCSI and break a few grammatical rules

          In English, “S” before a consonant typically retains its standard /s/ sound (as in “stop” or “snow”). Pronouncing “SCSI” as “Scuzzy” violates this by softening the second “S” into a /z/ sound before the consonant “Z,” which doesn’t follow the rule where “S” remains /s/ unless a voicing context (such as between two vowels) alters it.

          English has rules governing when consonants are “soft” (like “S” becoming /z/) or “hard” (like “C” becoming /k/). In “SCSI,” these letters maintain their distinct pronunciations, but when forced into “Scuzzy,” the “C” becomes part of a hard /sk/ sound, and the second “S” is softened into /z/. These changes are not guided by typical English consonant-hardening rules, especially since “SCSI” does not include the contextual elements that normally trigger these shifts (e.g., vowel placement following “C” in certain cases).

          You also have to add whole new vowels like “u” and “y”

          • sugar_in_your_tea
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The C is hard because the second word is “Computer.” The O in “Computer” becomes a “u” sound because “scossy” sounds odd.

            • cm0002@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Irrelevant, acronyms and initialisms don’t depend on the underlying words they stand for beyond the first letter of each word. You can’t use the word underlying C or any of the other letters for grammatical justification or pronunciation.

              Each letter must stand on its own and be governed by pronunciation rules independently of its underlying word, if it cannot form a sensible pronounceable word (Like FBI, CIA, SQL, SCSI) on its own it’s an initialism. If it can (Like NASA) then it’s an acronym.

              • sugar_in_your_tea
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Nah, there are no such rules, like anything else, initialisms are defined by speakers of the language, and that’s what industry professionals seem to use most often.

                • cm0002@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  what industry professionals seem to use most often.

                  Lol ok, if you want to change to that set of rules, I am an industry professional. Fairly deep into my IT career, and I will absolutely get on to any of my people if I see “Scuzzy” (Not that that particular one will ever come up again, fairly out of date lmao) or “Sequel” or any of that other bull

                  • sugar_in_your_tea
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Maybe it’s a regional thing, or maybe you’re just a hothead, hard to tell.

                    Either way, in my region, “scuzzy” and “sequel” are the dominant pronunciations for SCSI and SQL in my field.