• Jonathan Hendry@iosdev.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      @dgerard

      I had a bit making an exception for the value of “fine art” because that can get weird, like “unmade bed with a bunch of trash around it” or a signed urinal.

      But I seem to have left that part on the cutting room floor.

      If a piece of purely prompt-generated AI art hits a price like a shark in formaldehyde I strongly suspect it’ll be some kind of inorganic AI industry insider self-dealing to hype up the AI art market, similar to the big Beeple NFT sale.

      • V0ldek@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Okay but the shark in formaldehyde is fucking awesome to see in person.

        It’s a shark! In formaldehyde!!

        • Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          yeah, Hirst can be a bit of a hack and the names of the pieces are super cheugy but he’s definitely made some really evocative stuff

        • Jonathan Hendry@iosdev.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          @V0ldek

          Yeah I’m not dismissing that. It’s a big ass shark in a tank.

          Or the guy who made a cast of his own head using his own frozen blood, that’s kept in a special refrigerated display case.

      • corbin@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think it might be worth reflecting on exactly why Fountain seems to “get weird;” it had a context and complaints about it are part of that context. I liked this recent video which explores the politics of Fountain.

        • Jonathan Hendry@iosdev.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          @corbin

          I just mean “weird” in terms of “valued far higher than the average person might expect” but I’m not implying that that value isn’t merited. I’m not one to dismiss a Rothko.