• DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I moved to Utah and a lot of towns cities straddle mountains like this where the town is in the valley next to the mountains. It’s very cool, but Id take forests over a view. I find being surrounded by woods much more comforting than high desert with a view but I guess that just depends on where you grew up.

      • nikt@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The thing about forests around cities is they tend to get cut down and paved over. That’s much harder to do with mountains.

        • Adori@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In my city we’re surrounded by mountains, always one in view. No matter where you are in the city you know where you are cause they serve as giant landmarks.

          I think it’d be chilling to be surrounded by an ocean instead.

          • nuIl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think the user you’re replying to was making a joke, chilling = Chile.

            • Adori@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh yeah def went over my head xD, cuz I could see where they coming from with big ass towering landmass, it might feel like it could fall over you

  • DustyNipples@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Inspector Frank Butterman: suppose you’re wondering why we call them the “Andies”?

    Nicholas Angel: They’re both called Andrew?

    They said you were good!

    Danny Butterman: Also because talking to them is an uphill struggle, isn’t it, Dad? [Danny gets hit on the head with a wastepaper basket]

    Danny Butterman: Fuck off!

    • [email protected]@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Santiago is a cool town. I’ve been twice and I would definitely recommend a visit. It kind of answers the question, “what would Mexico City be like if it were in a developed, first-world country?”

  • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Nature is beautiful. Majestic mountain ranges. Sharp pavement roads. Concrete everywhere. The tiniest touch of green regulated to little parks. Not another animal in sight except for pigeons finding trash in vacant parking lots. Sometimes I like to sit on a porch and really take in all the air, noise, and light pollution. Ah

    • DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I can’t help but feel so frustrated seeing people develop places like this. In order to support wildlife they need valleys as well as mountains. You can’t just build on every strip of usable land because a lot of animals need to graze and nest there too.

      • scv@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then you should do some reading. Latin America is the most urban region in the world.

        We have small pockets with high density like Santiago. It has 1/3 of the population of NYC but 150% of the population density. And NYC is by far the densest US city.

        The result of this is wide swaths of nature, I grew up used to seeing no buildings or anything else man made all the way to the horizon. When approaching my hometown we would first see the city glow, because you get actual darkness out in the country. In the US’ lower 48 only part of Oregon and Nevada get close to that.

        Of course now US companies are once again trying to destroy our land with careless mining.

        • DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m glad to hear that’s not the case! I was speaking on my own experience living out west in the US where there is still a lot of public land. The attitude in the western US is unfortunately pretty bad. They want more and more public land to develop into low density single family home markets like Phoenix. It’s pretty infuriating hearing the locals moan about BLM and concoct conspiracies about how they stole land from them and show zero interest in the health of the local wildlife.

          There’s still quite a bit of untouched land in Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Navajo, basically anywhere that has large amounts of BLM land, but this unfortunately is getting pushback from locals who want everything to be developed.