frippa@lemmy.ml to LinkedinLunatics · 1 month ago...And the woman's name was Albert Einsteinlemmy.mlimagemessage-square61fedilinkarrow-up1403arrow-down129
arrow-up1374arrow-down1image...And the woman's name was Albert Einsteinlemmy.mlfrippa@lemmy.ml to LinkedinLunatics · 1 month agomessage-square61fedilink
minus-squarespookex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoThat just depends on the order of attributes you prefer to use to refer to a person. For me gender or age would usually come first rather than race
minus-squareRepple (she/her)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoOkay, that’s a fair point as to that comment not making it more sexist than racist, but not for it only being racist. I don’t see anything in the story pointing to race over sex.
minus-squarespookex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoI would argue that mentioning race at all is what makes it more of a racist thing. Like, why say that woman was black at all then? But it’s all just semantics, it’s a fake story that has both aspects in it, and it doesn’t really matter if it’s one or the other
That just depends on the order of attributes you prefer to use to refer to a person.
For me gender or age would usually come first rather than race
Okay, that’s a fair point as to that comment not making it more sexist than racist, but not for it only being racist. I don’t see anything in the story pointing to race over sex.
I would argue that mentioning race at all is what makes it more of a racist thing.
Like, why say that woman was black at all then?
But it’s all just semantics, it’s a fake story that has both aspects in it, and it doesn’t really matter if it’s one or the other