You must log in or register to comment.
So much sophism in the original reasoning.
At the time, a spokesperson for Counter-Terrorism Policing said: “The guidance document in question explicitly states that many of the groups included are not of counter terrorism interest, and that membership of them does not indicate criminality of any kind.”
This sounds like the removed mentions were actually protecting the vegan groups from counter-terrorism activities. The article doesn’t clarify that.
