• jubilationtcornpone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Microsoft is sunsetting Hyper-V Server (Not Hyper-V itself) so now you have to run Hyper-V on a bloated Windows Server install. Too bad because Hyper-V is actually a decent hypervisor and Microsoft is shutting out a lot of their smaller customers who don’t have the money for tons of exhorbitant licensing.

    I even use Hyper-V for my self hosted setup but I’ll be forced to switch in a few years whenever my host server is ready for retirement.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      They also offer the Azure Stack HCI platform, which is the modern version of hyper-v, but goddamn is it a pain in the ass (and requires active connection and subscription to azure for onprem workloads).

      It’s alright, but it’s my least favorite of the 3 platforms we run.

      • jubilationtcornpone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I think administrative overhead is the hidden cost that a lot of technology vendors fail to consider. Microsoft is especially guilty of this. Is a “good” product that requires an obscene amount of esoteric knowledge and experience to maintain really that good?

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah, I’m definitely not the biggest fan of HCI, especially the reporting aspect of it. I had to write my own damn reports just to see how badly we over provisioned disks once we found out it only reports on actual utilization.

          I tolerate Microsoft products and admin them, but damn they’re annoying to use at times.