Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 12 hours agoSuper hero movies should have more scenes of them accidentally maiming people just because of the sheer amount of power they weild.message-squaremessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up194arrow-down112
arrow-up182arrow-down1message-squareSuper hero movies should have more scenes of them accidentally maiming people just because of the sheer amount of power they weild.Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 12 hours agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squareSatyrSack@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·11 hours agoI think Hancock had a few instances of that
minus-squareLauchs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·10 hours agoNever got around to that one, worth it?
minus-squareCosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 hours agoHave it on in the background. I never fully understood Katherine Heigl’s character and her point in the plot. It’s decent. Not great.
minus-squareicerunner_origin@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down1·edit-210 hours agoCritically panned, across the board, but I enjoyed it nonetheless. It could have done with another couple of rounds of script polishing.
minus-squarekingthrillgore@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·14 minutes agoIt was a script undirected for 12 years
minus-squareKyrgizion@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up26·10 hours agoIt was two movies Frankensteined into one. The first half is awesome. The second, not so much.
minus-squareAnnoyed_🦀 @monyet.cclinkfedilinkarrow-up12·10 hours agoIt’s okay, not memorable though. I can’t seems to recall anything from that movie but i do remember i have fun watching it.
minus-squareMister_Feeny@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up9·9 hours agoI remember liking half of it. Oddly enough, I can’t remember whether I liked the first half where he’s a drunken bum, or the second half, where he’s more together, but I specifically remember thinking half of it was decent at least. So yeah, I agree that it’s not very memorable.
minus-squareBigPotato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 hours agoYou liked the drunken bum half. It just gets more stupid when the other guy’s woman is a super hero too.
minus-squareFosheze@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·10 hours agoIt’s not a good movie but it’s a fun watch if you’re not expecting much.
minus-squarekamenLady.@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·10 hours agoI wanted to like the movie, but drunk will smith just didn’t do it at all for me.
I think Hancock had a few instances of that
Never got around to that one, worth it?
Have it on in the background.
I never fully understood Katherine Heigl’s character and her point in the plot.
It’s decent. Not great.
Critically panned, across the board, but I enjoyed it nonetheless. It could have done with another couple of rounds of script polishing.
It was a script undirected for 12 years
It was two movies Frankensteined into one. The first half is awesome. The second, not so much.
It’s okay, not memorable though. I can’t seems to recall anything from that movie but i do remember i have fun watching it.
I remember liking half of it. Oddly enough, I can’t remember whether I liked the first half where he’s a drunken bum, or the second half, where he’s more together, but I specifically remember thinking half of it was decent at least.
So yeah, I agree that it’s not very memorable.
You liked the drunken bum half. It just gets more stupid when the other guy’s woman is a super hero too.
It’s not a good movie but it’s a fun watch if you’re not expecting much.
I wanted to like the movie, but drunk will smith just didn’t do it at all for me.