The fact the family can’t sue. They absolutely can (edit: in my opinion).
Disney Lawyers believe they can’t ( edit: in their opinion). But wether or not they can is up to a judge in this case. And not up to Disney.
So saying they can’t is false until there is actual clarity.
They believe that the users agreed to a contract that specifies that in any dealings with Disney they’ve agreed to binding arbitration.
What’s the “false statement” there?
The fact the family can’t sue. They absolutely can (edit: in my opinion). Disney Lawyers believe they can’t ( edit: in their opinion). But wether or not they can is up to a judge in this case. And not up to Disney.
So saying they can’t is false until there is actual clarity.
Edit: that is my opinion of course