• Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sad I had to scroll to the end to see this.

    Ocaml is brilliant and has the nicest type features. It’s almost like Haskell but more approachable imo.

    • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve recently been trying to learn OCaml and find it really nice. The major pain points are

      • C-style separate compilation with manually created headers
      • Small standard library
      • No generic print function
      • Hard to use external libraries
    • paperplane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Coming from Haskell, OCaml always felt a bit strange to me. The double semicolons, the inconsistency in the standard library between curried and uncurried functions etc. Maybe I’m confusing it with Standard ML though, can’t remember.

      • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I know double semicolons are a thing, but I’ve never had to use them. I forget what they’re for, but yeah it’s supposed to be an escape hatch for something that shouldn’t be happening iirc.

        The curried snd uncurried functions… Maybe you are confusing with SML, because everything in ocaml is curried by default. Though admittedly the standard library could be more complete, but I personally am happy to use third party dependencies for less common things.