RmDebArc_5 to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoX fails to avoid Australia child safety fine by arguing Twitter doesn’t existarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1541arrow-down113cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1528arrow-down1external-linkX fails to avoid Australia child safety fine by arguing Twitter doesn’t existarstechnica.comRmDebArc_5 to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square50fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareProx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-22 months agoWouldn’t the business license say still be for Twitter, with a DBA “X”?
minus-squareMisterFrog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 month agoI’ve had a dig (I have no idea what I’m doing) but in this ASIC registry, seems to show they filed to try and wind up the company, and that was rejected? Again, not a lawyer. (See the “Documents” section) https://connectonline.asic.gov.au/RegistrySearch/faces/landing/panelSearch.jspx?searchText=647102672&searchType=OrgAndBusNm Edit to add: And they still have their trademark registered, so it clearly still exists haha how bizarre.
Wouldn’t the business license say still be for Twitter, with a DBA “X”?
I’ve had a dig (I have no idea what I’m doing) but in this ASIC registry, seems to show they filed to try and wind up the company, and that was rejected? Again, not a lawyer. (See the “Documents” section)
https://connectonline.asic.gov.au/RegistrySearch/faces/landing/panelSearch.jspx?searchText=647102672&searchType=OrgAndBusNm
Edit to add: And they still have their trademark registered, so it clearly still exists haha how bizarre.