• seaQueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Leaving one privately run garden for another sure seems like a choice 🤔

      • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s centralized. They allow federation using their own protocol.

        But all you need to know is that it’s a capitalist, for-profit undertaking.

        • Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          I wasn’t a fan of the format. (and apparently I’m not allowed to have an opinion on format)

            • Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 minutes ago

              It’s kind of you, but not a huge deal. When I tried it (when there was an initial migration to Mastodon), it was so decentralized that you couldn’t really have much of a feed and it was tough to find much of anything.

      • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        When it’s built around lage aggregators, running which privately is rather hard, there’s a bias in favour of centralised, large operators thereof, which mitigates some of the advantages.