• darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    If they stick with a Samsung manufactured 750G, it’ll be limited to the low end market. There’s nothing wrong with that but it’s not really an option for the western mid to high end market.

    • blackris@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, they will use a 778G.

      Why do you think a slower processor would be a no-go? Are there so much people who care for that? Apart from smartphone gaming (which I find really stupid), this shouldn’t really matter.

      • darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think we can agree that most people will never need anything more than a midrange processor for average use and only overbuy due to marketing.

        Speaking only for myself, I’ve become accustomed to the snappiness of higher end processors and high refresh screens. All the screens I use on a daily basis are 120hz+ and even though I don’t game on my phone, the benefits of having a high refresh rate screen has become a nice quality of life feature for me. I still have a 60hz phone that I test as a degoogled phone and the difference is quite noticeable.

        A high-end processor helps drive apps at those higher refresh rates and also just as important, it can brute-force some of the less-than-well optimized open source apps I rely on to interact with my self-hosted infrastructure.

        I can live with a lower-end phone but I’m willing to pay a bit more for features and performance that meet my standards.